I really have had no desire to re-enter public debate regarding the UMC. In fact, I have had a great desire not to do so. For the most part, I think the die has been cast. The 2019 General Conference will bring some form of “restructuring” that will allow parties with divergent views to live their ecclesiastical lives as they see fit. Because this is a family dispute, the process leading up to the restructuring will be full of bitter invective, and by the time it is all over, we will all be ready for a change.
Nevertheless, after reading Jim Harnish’s recent blog post, “Will the Center Hold?” I feel it necessary to address some of the misconceptions that seem to be making their way into the public consciousness within the UMC.
The Quiet Center
There is a “chorus of shouting” that has been drowning out “the quieter voices of the vital center.” They picture the UMC on the brink of disaster or division because equally faithful United Methodists hold differing biblically-rooted convictions about same-sex marriage and ordination of LGBT clergy.
The basic scenario then, is that the “conservatives” and the “progressives” are in a shouting match that is drowning out the quiet, sensible voice of those in the “middle.” This does not ring true for me. I know lots of sensible, reasoned conservatives and progressives who hold their convictions strongly, but who are not shouting at one another, writing blog posts excoriating each other, or dropping Facebook napalm on their ideological foes. To be a “conservative” or “progressive” in the UMC is simply to hold a broad set of convictions normally associated with these categories. These labels say nothing of the ways in which we go about making those convictions known or advocating for them. Of course there are conservatives and progressives who go berserk on social media. That’s the world in which we live. Bad behavior, however, has no particular ideological home.
As for the quiet repose of those in the middle, again I must disagree. Adam Hamilton, the most visible spokesperson for this group, has been far from quiet. My friend Mike Slaughter has not been quiet. Both have vigorously promoted the local option as a solution to our present disagreement. They have argued this point on the floor of General Conference and written various blog posts about it. Hamilton in particular has been active in social media in attempts to advance this cause. In a related volley, he has written a book on Scripture that comes to bear in significant ways on our debates related to LGBT people. I do not fault them for their advocacy. I believe strongly in vigorous, respectful public debate. There is no way to argue, however, that these proponents of the “local option” have been quiet in the midst of our denominational discussions.
The United Methodist Centrist Movement has not been particularly quiet, either. They implemented a highly effective social media campaign before the election of 2016 General Conference delegates in West Ohio, one that cast evangelicals as schismatic. They then formed an alliance with progressives that strongly affected the outcome of the election. Since that time they have maintained an active presence on social media.
And what of others whom we might think of as occupying moderate territory? Bishop Scott Jones, for example, coined the term “extreme center.” He has been more vocal than most others in the Council of Bishops. My good friends at the Wesleyan Way, formerly Via Media Methodists, have long eschewed ideological polarities while taking an active role in denominational debates. I can hear some saying now that Bishop Jones and the gentlemen of Wesleyan Way are conservatives, not centrists. I can only reply that if these good souls no longer to sit somewhere in the center, then the center has shifted so far to the left as to be unrecognizable to many.
There are indeed those in the “center” who have maintained a quiet composure, just as there are conservatives and progressives who have done so. To hold this up as the defining characteristic of the center, though, is not consistent with what I have witnessed.
The Catholic Spirit
There is a widespread misconception that John Wesley would have approved of the breadth of theological, ethical, and ideological diversity that we witness today within the UMC. Most often this misconception is accompanied by quotations from his sermon, “The Catholic Spirit,” such as, “Though we cannot think alike, may we not love alike? May we not be of one heart, though we are not of one opinion? Without all doubt, we may.” Let’s look at the wider context of that quotation, though.
But although a difference in opinions or modes of worship may prevent an entire external union, yet need it prevent our union in affection? Though we cannot think alike, may we not love alike? May we not be of one heart, though we are not of one opinion? Without all doubt, we may. Herein all the children of God may unite, notwithstanding these smaller differences. These remaining as they are, they may forward one another in love and in good works. [My italics]
14 thoughts on “Left, Right, and Center: Some Misconceptions”
I must disagree with the author’s lengthy treatise. The Rev. Drs. Hamilton and Slaughter do have a centrist and workable solution to the issue of the ordination of clerics and bishops. Really, think about it. Two UMCs may think differently regarding many aspects of UMC dogma. Some are very progressive, while others are conservative. Why not allow those churches who would happily accept a LBGTQAI pastor be assigned a man or woman who is LBGTQAI. Look, if you will, at the six conferences that are in “non conformity” with the BoD. These conferences do not consider a person’s sexual orientation, or gender identity when assessing a possible pastoral candidate for ordination. These conferences choose to ordain women and men who have graduated seminary, are compassionate, kind, caring, and competent in their field.
These same conferences do not punish their clerics for performing marriages for same gender couples. These conferences, and there will be more of such conferences as time goes by, are content with their choice, and should not be castigated by those conferences that disagree. Each is doing what they feel is God’s work, of feeding the hungry, caring for the unfortunate, and hopefully preaching sermons that are relevant to today’s issues.
Comments are closed.