Trump, Evangelicals, and the Road Ahead

In 1934, at the age of 28, Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote a letter to a friend about an upcoming conference that would involve members of churches from several countries and denominations. In this letter, he wrote, “We must make it clear—fearful as it is—that the time is very near when we shall have to decide between National Socialism and Christianity. It may be fearfully hard and difficult for us all, but we must get right to the root of things, with open Christian speaking and no diplomacy. And in prayer together we will find the way.”[1] This was before the Holocaust began, before WWII began. But Bonhoeffer saw that one could not embrace the Christian faith and embrace the political tide of his nation that was so enamored with the Nazi party. The two simply were not compatible. On April 9th, 1945, he was executed for his part in the German resistance to the Nazi regime.

The necessity of such a distinction—between the values of our faith and the values embodied in large segments of the wider culture—is once again becoming apparent. It is alarming to see so many people in the United States embracing Donald Trump in his bid to become President of the United States. No, Trump is not Hitler, but he nevertheless embodies values that should cause serious concern among Christians.

One of the great ironies of Trump’s candidacy, however, is that so many of his supporters are evangelical Christians. While many evangelicals, as well of Christians of other stripes, oppose Trump, he doesn’t need all of us. He only needs enough to get elected. Christian support for Trump is essential for his success moving forward.

I myself identify as an evangelical, though this may not tell you much. The term “evangelical” has become rather diffuse over the last couple of decades. It can describe Christians as different as Franklin Graham and Jim Wallis. According to the National Association of Evangelicals, there are four primary characteristics of evangelicalism:

Conversionism: the belief that lives need to be transformed through a “born-again” experience and a life long process of following Jesus.

Activism: the expression and demonstration of the gospel in missionary and social reform efforts.

Biblicism: a high regard for and obedience to the Bible as the ultimate authority.

Crucicentrism: a stress on the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross as making possible the redemption of humanity

These four characteristics fit me quite well, but I will never support Donald Trump. In fact, I will never support Donald Trump because I’m an evangelical Christian. He mocks everything Christians should embody. He scapegoats the culturally vulnerable. He shows deep contempt for those whom he sees as different (e.g., Muslims and Mexicans). He has openly and unashamedly derided both women and ethnic minorities. He has even said that a man should treat women “like shit.” He has posed on the cover of Playboy. He consistently insults and demeans those with whom he disagrees. He has belittled Holy Communion, referring to it as drinking his “little wine” and eating his “little cracker.” Consistent with this last offense, he is flippantly dismissive of the idea that he needs to engage in any type of personal repentance.

Nevertheless, a substantial number of evangelicals are backing Trump. Why would they do this? According to the New York Times,

“Social conservatives are taking a look at Trump and saying he’s not with me on all these issues, but the overall larger imperative for us is to tear down this system that has not served us for a very long time,” said Gregg Keller, a former executive director of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, which was founded by the Christian conservative Ralph Reed.

Presumably, once we “tear down this system,” we will replace it with one friendlier to our own priorities. My fellow evangelicals, let me state this clearly: the “system” will never serve us, because the “system” is not of Christ. The “system” is a political machine beholden to special interests, lobbying groups, large corporations, financial contributors, and other entities, many of which are not the least bit concerned with anything remotely resembling Christian values. The idea that you can tear down the “system” and reshape it to serve you is, and always has been, a lie. It has been a lie since the time of Constantine. The “system” is about power, but Christ’s power is the power of the cross, and God’s power is made perfect in weakness. Christians must always stand outside the “system,” even when it is ostensibly Christian. As Christ taught us, “No one can serve two masters; for a slave will either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise the other.” Christians willing to compromise core tenets of the faith in order to bend the political process to their will may win in the short term, but it will be a pyrrhic victory. In the end, they will lose far more than they gain. “For what will it profit them to gain the whole world and forfeit their life?” (Mark 8:36). It’s not worth it, Christians–not even close.

Many Christian leaders have been critical of Trump. Pope Francis stated, “A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian.” Max Lucado has written that Trump does not pass the decency test. Evangelical attorney and activist John Stemberger has written a scathing critique of Trump for CNN. Trump seems unfazed by these remarks. He criticized the Pope’s remarks, saying that it is “disgraceful” to question another person’s faith. Consider, for a moment, the great irony of Trump–who has made public remarks belittling Hillary Clinton’s sex life, who called Arianna Huffington a “dog,” and  who belittled John McCain’s service to his country in a Vietnamese prison camp–calling another person’s remarks “disgraceful.” Consider the additional irony of the fact that the person whose comments Trump criticized is Pope Francis, a man who has championed the cause of the poor and the politically disenfranchised.  Trump has made his faith a matter of public record. It would be irresponsible for Christian leaders not to scrutinize the extent to which his actions are consistent with the faith he claims to hold.

I have a robust doctrine of sin, and therefore I don’t hold very high expectations of politicians. I’m not singling Trump out because of his unchristian behavior. I’m writing about him now because his behavior and proposed politics resemble nothing like Christianity and he is enjoying a substantial portion of the evangelical vote. I don’t expect Trump to act like a Christian, but I also don’t expect other Christians to support a candidate whose values are so antithetical to those of Christians across a broad theological spectrum.

Cultural Christianity has collapsed, and Christians do not enjoy the place of privilege we once did in the United States. It was only a matter of time before this happened, but now we have to make a choice. The time has come. We are going to have to choose between a false sense of national and cultural security and the values of Jesus. The xenophobic, privileged, narcissistic ethos that Trump embodies is antithetical to the values of Christ, who said, “If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the gospel,will save it” (Mark 8:34-35).”

I am not suggesting that Trump would usher in an era as tragic as the one Bonhoeffer foresaw. Nevertheless, America is not so exceptional that we are incapable of grievous sin as a nation. We have done it before, and we are capable of doing it again. There is much to love about the United States, and there is much for which we should repent. The curious phenomenon of Donald Trump’s candidacy makes it clear that Christians are now at a point where we are going to have to make a choice. Who will we follow? Will we follow Christ and rightly understand ourselves as a countercultural family of faith, or will we baptize an idol of crass materialism, place a crown on its head, and call it Jesus?

[1] Hauerwas, Performing the Faith, 60.

406 thoughts on “Trump, Evangelicals, and the Road Ahead

  1. “It is alarming to see so many people in the United States embracing Donald Trump in his bid to become President of the United States. No, Trump is not Hitler, but he nevertheless embodies values that should cause serious concern among Christians.”:

    Hitler wasn’t Hitler until he became Chancellor of Germany.
    Herr Rump won’t become a true Hitler until he becomes POTUS.

  2. – addendum: as Pastor Harrison posted today “(The) Augsburg Confession praises legal action, when necessary: “Public remedy, made through the office of the public official, is not condemned, but is commanded and is God’s work, according to Paul (Romans 13). Now the different kinds of public remedy are legal decisions, capital punishment, wars, and military service” (Ap XVI 59).” So to sum up, one cannot have public remedy if one does not vote; sometimes one has to vote for the choice of greater good and in this case (if in fact Trump is the nominee) then a conservative should put him in office – if only to get a conservative appointed to the Supreme Court. No Mr Watson, you are dead wrong: you are commanded “as an evangelical” to engage in the public square according to ROM 13; so put down the pen and take up the reins of leadership and encourage everyone to VOTE.

    • i did not see that he wasn’t encouraging people to vote only that he was telling them to look at Trump and what his values really are then vote for another of the GOP candidates for the nominee. We as Christians are required to participate in elections and politics.

    • Hate Hater,
      Since you bring up the Augsburg Confession lets look at it in context and see if your argument that we must vote follows.

      “Article XVI Of Civil Affairs

      Of Civil Affairs they teach that lawful civil ordinances are good works of God, and that it is right for Christians to bear civil office, to sit as judges, to judge matters by the Imperial and other existing laws, to award just punishments, to engage in just wars, to serve as soldiers, to make legal contracts, to hold property, to make oath when required by the magistrates, to marry a wife, to be given in marriage.

      They condemn the Anabaptists who forbid these civil offices to Christians.

      They condemn also those who do not place evangelical perfection in the fear of God and in faith, but in forsaking civil offices, for the Gospel teaches an eternal righteousness of the heart. Meanwhile, it does not destroy the State or the family, but very much requires that they be preserved as ordinances of God, and that charity be practiced in such ordinances. Therefore, Christians are necessarily bound to obey their own magistrates and laws save only when commanded to sin; for then they ought to obey God rather than men. Acts 5, 29.”

      In context Article 16 does not, as you suppose, command individuals to vote. Indeed given the context and time it was written I suspect that “voting” was not on the mind of the authors. Certainly I can find no evidence from the text itself. Instead Article 16 allows, Christian participation in civil office, specifically as magistrates, military officials, etc, and notes that scripture can’t be used to avoid civil responsibility under the law when such commands do not mandate “sin”.

      Therefore I can’t see how voting for one person or another is commanded by either scripture or the creed. Voting is a right. And like all rights can be waived or set aside pursuant to established civil law. Think of your right to free speech under Amendment 1 to the US Constitution. You can say what you like about someone (especially public figures like Mr. Trump), so long as you don’t deliberately lie about them. That’s called “slander.” And Mr. Trump will sue you for it in a heartbeat, as he has threated to do to his fellow Republicans, when they say something he doesn’t like.

      Bottom line, Christians have an obligation to be discerning and dissent when appropriate – this is completely consistent with the creed. I will never vote for Mr. Trump because I don’t believe he is an honorable man capable of holding high public office. That’s just my opinion – which I am allowed to have under the first amendment and pursuant to the Augsburg Creed.

      If presented with Mr. Trump as a choice I would rather waive my right to vote then vote for the lesser of two evils or even the “greater good” as you put it. I would not, though if we follow your logic – we would have to, vote for the fascism of Benito Mousseline to avoid the fascism of Adolf Hitler. Christ holds me accountable for my choices, including those made at the ballot box. With Mr. Trump I choose not to choose.

      One last thing, as to your opinion that we ought to vote for Mr. Trump, should he be the nominee, simply to get a conservative nominee to the Supreme Court is pretty specious as well. First, what is a “conservative”? Many conservatives have wildly different views on things like social and fiscal policy. Second, assuming you could nail down a definition, a “conservative” President (which I do not believe the Donald Trump is) may nominate someone who does not follow through with conservative principles once on the court. Case in point, President G. W. Bush nominated Chief Justice John Roberts to the court based on his “conservative” credentials. Yet Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion in King V. Burwell (which upheld the Affordable Care Act – AKA Obamacare) to the surprise and disgust of many “conservative” court watchers. Other numerous example could be cited.

  3. I disagree with you Mr. Watson with a lot of things in this article, for one was about the Pope statement, about the wall. Was a set up from the Mexican Gov. And ask the Pope about the wall. The Pope said that anyone who builds a wall without bridges, would be non christian. When in fact Trump always said, it was about illegal Immigration, and to come here the right way. And anyone would be offended being accused of not being Christian, for wanting to build a wall to protect your county from illegal invasion, and wants them to come the right way. And as accusing Trump for being, for socialism and racist, when in fact it was the Envagelicals didn’t vote, and let the biggest socialist and racist, to be elected president in the history of States of America. I’m not sure if I’m going to vote for Trump yet, but if he wins the nomination, I will vote for him, because the democrats are anti-God, anti-life, and are for socialism.

  4. So what do we do ? Who do we vote for ? Hillary Clinton who is just as bad as trump or worse ??

    • She is the worst. Trump has done many good things and no one is perfect. But he has many excellent qualities.

    • Yes, I’d like to know who we should vote for too when both candidates are not able to hold office of president successfully. It is only for their own purposes. Trump just wants to show he can do it and Clinton , well, she scares me to death. She should be in prison but is being protected . The only thing I can see that we must do is pray. God is still in control and He knows what He is doing. But as this article stated Christians are in danger in this time period and we must stand for what we believe in and that is Jesus Christ as our savior and Lord and there is more coming than just this earth when one day Christ will usher in a whole new world and all will be worth it for those who believe and stand up.

Comments are closed.