In 1934, at the age of 28, Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote a letter to a friend about an upcoming conference that would involve members of churches from several countries and denominations. In this letter, he wrote, “We must make it clear—fearful as it is—that the time is very near when we shall have to decide between National Socialism and Christianity. It may be fearfully hard and difficult for us all, but we must get right to the root of things, with open Christian speaking and no diplomacy. And in prayer together we will find the way.”[1] This was before the Holocaust began, before WWII began. But Bonhoeffer saw that one could not embrace the Christian faith and embrace the political tide of his nation that was so enamored with the Nazi party. The two simply were not compatible. On April 9th, 1945, he was executed for his part in the German resistance to the Nazi regime.
The necessity of such a distinction—between the values of our faith and the values embodied in large segments of the wider culture—is once again becoming apparent. It is alarming to see so many people in the United States embracing Donald Trump in his bid to become President of the United States. No, Trump is not Hitler, but he nevertheless embodies values that should cause serious concern among Christians.
One of the great ironies of Trump’s candidacy, however, is that so many of his supporters are evangelical Christians. While many evangelicals, as well of Christians of other stripes, oppose Trump, he doesn’t need all of us. He only needs enough to get elected. Christian support for Trump is essential for his success moving forward.
I myself identify as an evangelical, though this may not tell you much. The term “evangelical” has become rather diffuse over the last couple of decades. It can describe Christians as different as Franklin Graham and Jim Wallis. According to the National Association of Evangelicals, there are four primary characteristics of evangelicalism:
Conversionism: the belief that lives need to be transformed through a “born-again” experience and a life long process of following Jesus.
Activism: the expression and demonstration of the gospel in missionary and social reform efforts.
Biblicism: a high regard for and obedience to the Bible as the ultimate authority.
Crucicentrism: a stress on the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross as making possible the redemption of humanity
These four characteristics fit me quite well, but I will never support Donald Trump. In fact, I will never support Donald Trump because I’m an evangelical Christian. He mocks everything Christians should embody. He scapegoats the culturally vulnerable. He shows deep contempt for those whom he sees as different (e.g., Muslims and Mexicans). He has openly and unashamedly derided both women and ethnic minorities. He has even said that a man should treat women “like shit.” He has posed on the cover of Playboy. He consistently insults and demeans those with whom he disagrees. He has belittled Holy Communion, referring to it as drinking his “little wine” and eating his “little cracker.” Consistent with this last offense, he is flippantly dismissive of the idea that he needs to engage in any type of personal repentance.
Nevertheless, a substantial number of evangelicals are backing Trump. Why would they do this? According to the New York Times,
“Social conservatives are taking a look at Trump and saying he’s not with me on all these issues, but the overall larger imperative for us is to tear down this system that has not served us for a very long time,” said Gregg Keller, a former executive director of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, which was founded by the Christian conservative Ralph Reed.
This article ignores the fact that there are a limited number of choices one has available when voting for President. At this time, it looks like the choices will be Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. The “system” is the U.S. Government. Imperfect as it is, it is the best in the world, by far, if our leaders abide by the Constitution.
Personally, I look for integrity and competence. I find Hillary Clinton bankrupt on both those criteria. That the Secretary of State would be so careless about her communications as to ignore basic security procedures is beyond incompetent. I don’t accuse her of malicious intent regarding American national security, but the effect was the same. Then she lied about it. And we still don’t know why better security was not provided at the Benghazi embassy. What difference does it make now? It is a mortal blow to her reputation for competence.
On the criticisms lodged against Trump above, I would point out that the characterizations of what Trump actually said are profound distortions trumpeted by the media. Regarding Muslims, it is only reasonable that the ones we allow into the US are not among those radical Muslims that come from beheading Christians in their own country to do mayhem in ours. Regarding illegal immigrants and the wall at the Mexican border, what part of “illegal” don’t you understand? Yes, there are certainly circumstances that call for Christian grace and mercy, but it is quite reasonable to ask our government to get control of the situation. That is what Trump really said. It was unfortunate that the Pope chose to accuse Trump of not being Christian, but in the heat of a Presidential campaign, the comment simply could not be ignored. The days of Papal Excommunication are over. God has again retained that decision for Himself.
“On the criticisms lodged against Trump above, I would point out that the characterizations of what Trump actually said are profound distortions trumpeted by the media.” This is not true. Too many clips and too many first person viewings of his statements are available.
” That is what Trump really said. It was unfortunate that the Pope chose to accuse Trump of not being Christian” This is not what Pope Francis said. He said, “…a person who does these things…”
Mr. Trump has also called for the bombing of families of our enemies. I heard him say it. This is not only a war crime, but certainly not what I would expect of a person who claims to be a Christian.
I, as an “evangelical” Christian as pointed out by the outlined points above, also agree with these statements and I might add, Trump will serve the public at large and America as a nation and Christianity as a whole, better than any “Democrat” ideology. The Democrats are already a socialist party, Trump, as bad as He is, is not Socialist, and anti- Constitution as defined by the founding Fathers, mostly Christian or Dietiest. If your Christian, you cannot vote for Hillary.
I am a life long Christian and I urge you not to vote for a person who has no humanity in his words or deeds.
If you vote against Trump you’re voting for Hillary. Is she a better choice for Christians? She lies non-stop, supports killing babies and supports the LGBT community. What are we to do?
If you vote against Drumpf, you are voting against the man who has called for the bombing of the families of our enemies. He made the point that this was how to hurt them.
Well, obviously there is a wide array of Christians, some who support LGBT issues and Planned Parenthood. Like me. Hillary Clinton has been cleared of any charges related to Benghazi even though a multi-million investigation was headed by Republicans trying to skewer her. Actually Hillary is too moderate for my taste, so I may be voting for Bernie Sanders. Both options are better than any GOP candidate in my opinion.
Finally a voice of reason. Thank you!
Pope as a Christian leader who thinks all paths leads to God…hummm not so sure about that one. Either don’t vote or pick the lesser of two evils.ha!