In 1934, at the age of 28, Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote a letter to a friend about an upcoming conference that would involve members of churches from several countries and denominations. In this letter, he wrote, “We must make it clear—fearful as it is—that the time is very near when we shall have to decide between National Socialism and Christianity. It may be fearfully hard and difficult for us all, but we must get right to the root of things, with open Christian speaking and no diplomacy. And in prayer together we will find the way.”[1] This was before the Holocaust began, before WWII began. But Bonhoeffer saw that one could not embrace the Christian faith and embrace the political tide of his nation that was so enamored with the Nazi party. The two simply were not compatible. On April 9th, 1945, he was executed for his part in the German resistance to the Nazi regime.
The necessity of such a distinction—between the values of our faith and the values embodied in large segments of the wider culture—is once again becoming apparent. It is alarming to see so many people in the United States embracing Donald Trump in his bid to become President of the United States. No, Trump is not Hitler, but he nevertheless embodies values that should cause serious concern among Christians.
One of the great ironies of Trump’s candidacy, however, is that so many of his supporters are evangelical Christians. While many evangelicals, as well of Christians of other stripes, oppose Trump, he doesn’t need all of us. He only needs enough to get elected. Christian support for Trump is essential for his success moving forward.
I myself identify as an evangelical, though this may not tell you much. The term “evangelical” has become rather diffuse over the last couple of decades. It can describe Christians as different as Franklin Graham and Jim Wallis. According to the National Association of Evangelicals, there are four primary characteristics of evangelicalism:
Conversionism: the belief that lives need to be transformed through a “born-again” experience and a life long process of following Jesus.
Activism: the expression and demonstration of the gospel in missionary and social reform efforts.
Biblicism: a high regard for and obedience to the Bible as the ultimate authority.
Crucicentrism: a stress on the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross as making possible the redemption of humanity
These four characteristics fit me quite well, but I will never support Donald Trump. In fact, I will never support Donald Trump because I’m an evangelical Christian. He mocks everything Christians should embody. He scapegoats the culturally vulnerable. He shows deep contempt for those whom he sees as different (e.g., Muslims and Mexicans). He has openly and unashamedly derided both women and ethnic minorities. He has even said that a man should treat women “like shit.” He has posed on the cover of Playboy. He consistently insults and demeans those with whom he disagrees. He has belittled Holy Communion, referring to it as drinking his “little wine” and eating his “little cracker.” Consistent with this last offense, he is flippantly dismissive of the idea that he needs to engage in any type of personal repentance.
Nevertheless, a substantial number of evangelicals are backing Trump. Why would they do this? According to the New York Times,
“Social conservatives are taking a look at Trump and saying he’s not with me on all these issues, but the overall larger imperative for us is to tear down this system that has not served us for a very long time,” said Gregg Keller, a former executive director of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, which was founded by the Christian conservative Ralph Reed.
Very limited for a limited audience. Personally I find the pope to be irrelevant. He has no standing and most of what he says annoys me as a Christian. Secondly, Christians are voting for Trump because they see a fairness in him that they do not see in the others. This country does not consist solely of believers and the election does need to be won. Cruz, well Mr. Fakey does not appeal to any but ultra conservative Christians. Not a winner. A vote for him is a vote for status quo or worse because he will not beat Hillary or Sanders.
These constant anti-Trump missives do nothing but support the liberal cause.
Fairness? Wow! That’s a concept foreign to Trump. You probably haven’t really done research on Trump. Not via CNN, but other means… stories, from before he started his candidacy. If you do, you will find a man who thinks of Trump and no one else. In any case, I guess your concept of Trump’s “fairness” will not change unless you find yourself at the receiving end of his insults. Not only that but as a Christian, I cannot support him. MY GOD CALLS ME TO BE KIND TO SOJOURNERS AND TO STAND FOR JUSTICE.
Then who do you support? He is the lesser of the two evils. No he’s not who I want in office either, but the alternative is a socialist or a Clinton who will continue Obamas craziness. Sometimes you must pick the lesser of two evils. If he’s true to his word he will support Israel, support prolife, and ecomomically bring this country back as much as possible with jobs and affordable living. There is so much about this man I dislike, but we agree on those thing at least and they very important things to me and to God.
Which stuff annoys you? The stuff about love, and justice, and good stewardship of the earth? Seriously, what annoys you that is contrary to Christian theology and ethics?
http://www.politijim.com/2016/02/the-concordance-of-cruz-corruption.html
It drives me crazy when middle- to upper-middle class, white-privileged male theologians – who occupy positions of power, such as a deanship — go around saying how bad power is, and that God’s power is “made perfect in weakness,” and simply leave it at that. That’s irresponsible, for it merely covers up the vast power they themselves exercise, and the extent to which they benefit from a system loaded in their favor.
While God is Infinite, and we are finite and flawed, God put power in our hands, and expects us to be responsible stewards of it. Power is a divine gift (2 Tim. 1:7). As a matter of fact, when persons are baptized in The United Methodist Church, they are asked: “Do you accept the freedom and power God gives you to resist evil, injustice, and oppression in whatever forms they present themselves?” Presumably, resistance against evil, injustice, and oppression isn’t simply an inner mental event. What’s bad is not power itself, but rather unaccountable, over-accumulated power in the hands of a few elites who benefit from it at the expense of the masses. Responsible, relational exercise of power “for” and power “with” is very different from abusive, unilateral use of power “over.”
In this country there will never be a more equitable distribution of access to basic human necessities until there’s a more equitable distribution of power, and collaborative, accountable use of collective grassroots power. It takes power – not weakness! — to limit power, and to hold power accountable. I’m not sure what Watson means by standing outside the system – because Christians are called to enter the public sphere, and work hand in hand with others to help make sure that vulnerable groups are not dominated and exploited by unaccountable power. As Paul Tillich insisted, Christian love is not the negation of power, but rather its proper grounding. “Love, power, and justice are united in God and they are united in the new creation of God in the world,” he said. Unless and until we unite and integrate love, power, and justice, the Donald Trumps of this world will prevail – and, I should add, only middle- to upper-middle class, white-privileged male theologians will have access to being Dean of a mainline seminary.
Reality. It’s either him or Hillary. Fact is there are more democrats in the US then republicans so by choosing to not vote you are giving Hillary a better chance of winning because that is one less republican. Faith is important and I’m a born again Christian but we’re at the stage now where it’s one or the other. Is Hillary a better fit then trump for evangelicals? They are the only 2 choices! You can write in your own candidate but that still gives Hillary a better chance. I know we are following our conscience but reality will be one or the other and who will treat Christians better. These are all serious questions though because I’m trying to get answers.
When has there ever been a president elected that you were completely in line with? But yet in the past you chose the one to vote for that most closely aligned with your morals and values. Why is it different now? I am not necessarily a Trump supporter. I detest his arrogance and demeanor, but in the end as noted in an earlier comment, if he does what he says he will do, he will protect and defend the constitution, support Israel, and defend the second amendment, and from where I sit, that is a lot more closely aligned than anything else I see in the running right now. We are called to support and pray for our government, not sit on the sidelines and complain about our options because in the end God puts Kings on Thrones and he Removes them Daniel 2:21. If you are a conservative Christian as I am, I implore you, Please do not sit the election out because all of the candidates do not meet your exact criteria. Find the one that most CLOSELY aligns and VOTE, because regardless of what you think, a non vote IS a vote, and that thought should alert your conscience. So do your best, get out and vote, and let God take care of the rest.
Where do you find the truth about either one of them??
Thank you Greg for your thoughts. As a Bible believing Christian I so often forget who is really in charge here. I may like to think we are, but we are not. Too often I forget the simple reality that “prayer changes things”. As a Christian, it is my responsibility to vote and pray. May our prayers and lives reflect our Master, Lord, and King.