In 1934, at the age of 28, Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote a letter to a friend about an upcoming conference that would involve members of churches from several countries and denominations. In this letter, he wrote, “We must make it clear—fearful as it is—that the time is very near when we shall have to decide between National Socialism and Christianity. It may be fearfully hard and difficult for us all, but we must get right to the root of things, with open Christian speaking and no diplomacy. And in prayer together we will find the way.”[1] This was before the Holocaust began, before WWII began. But Bonhoeffer saw that one could not embrace the Christian faith and embrace the political tide of his nation that was so enamored with the Nazi party. The two simply were not compatible. On April 9th, 1945, he was executed for his part in the German resistance to the Nazi regime.
The necessity of such a distinction—between the values of our faith and the values embodied in large segments of the wider culture—is once again becoming apparent. It is alarming to see so many people in the United States embracing Donald Trump in his bid to become President of the United States. No, Trump is not Hitler, but he nevertheless embodies values that should cause serious concern among Christians.
One of the great ironies of Trump’s candidacy, however, is that so many of his supporters are evangelical Christians. While many evangelicals, as well of Christians of other stripes, oppose Trump, he doesn’t need all of us. He only needs enough to get elected. Christian support for Trump is essential for his success moving forward.
I myself identify as an evangelical, though this may not tell you much. The term “evangelical” has become rather diffuse over the last couple of decades. It can describe Christians as different as Franklin Graham and Jim Wallis. According to the National Association of Evangelicals, there are four primary characteristics of evangelicalism:
Conversionism: the belief that lives need to be transformed through a “born-again” experience and a life long process of following Jesus.
Activism: the expression and demonstration of the gospel in missionary and social reform efforts.
Biblicism: a high regard for and obedience to the Bible as the ultimate authority.
Crucicentrism: a stress on the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross as making possible the redemption of humanity
These four characteristics fit me quite well, but I will never support Donald Trump. In fact, I will never support Donald Trump because I’m an evangelical Christian. He mocks everything Christians should embody. He scapegoats the culturally vulnerable. He shows deep contempt for those whom he sees as different (e.g., Muslims and Mexicans). He has openly and unashamedly derided both women and ethnic minorities. He has even said that a man should treat women “like shit.” He has posed on the cover of Playboy. He consistently insults and demeans those with whom he disagrees. He has belittled Holy Communion, referring to it as drinking his “little wine” and eating his “little cracker.” Consistent with this last offense, he is flippantly dismissive of the idea that he needs to engage in any type of personal repentance.
Nevertheless, a substantial number of evangelicals are backing Trump. Why would they do this? According to the New York Times,
“Social conservatives are taking a look at Trump and saying he’s not with me on all these issues, but the overall larger imperative for us is to tear down this system that has not served us for a very long time,” said Gregg Keller, a former executive director of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, which was founded by the Christian conservative Ralph Reed.


If Trump wins to represent the republicans, then what’s my option as an evangelical republican? Any suggestion? Vote for the lesser evil? Who’s the lesser evil?
Follow my post thukiwenamfukwe@word press. Com
I realize Trump may not be the optimal Christian. We are all sinners and have no right to judge ones Walk with God. Posing for the cover of Playboy is not an abomination to the Lord. A poor choice, yes. A gateway to hell, no. The pope was wrong to question his beliefs. A wall may be necessary to protect and preserve the United States. A bridge may not be possible. The drugs and continued influx of illegal people is a danger and drain on our economy. We must consider that the pope has a huge amount of security and is protected at all times. We are not. As for Hillary Clinton. She is a woman derserving of nothing more than prayer. Prayer for compassion and forgiveness for the many sins she has perpetrated in the American people. Murdering our servicemen and lying about it. Continuing to lie about the security and personal e-mails, stealing from the White House, and standing by her whitemingering husband. Comparing Trump to Hitler is a stretch. He is tich and therefore powerful. He frightens Washington. If he wins it is the end of the good old boys. I would much rather have Trump than Cruz. He pretends to be a God fearing Christian, yet he has lied repeatedly to get votes. He scares me more. A wolf in Sheeps clothing. Just because a cat had kittens in the oven does not make them biscuits.
I must respectfully disagree, Sandra. To be Christian means to be Christ-like, and Trump has consistently shown he is nothing like Christ. He is a wicked man. Yes, true, we are all sinners, but I have no interest in electing an openly perverted liar into the Oval Office. I agree that Hillary needs much prayer as well.
Comparing Trump to Hitler really isn’t much of a stretch. They both lie a lot, both support the murder of innocents, both are “my way or the highway”, both use angry rhetoric, both are worshipped and adored by the masses . . . just saying.
And I must say, I cannot understand why you would rather want Trump than Cruz. To my knowledge, Cruz’s only major mistake was the ordeal with Ben Carson in Iowa. And my understanding of that was that it was just that — a misunderstanding. Was it handled properly? Not at all, but Cruz publicly apologized. What else could he do? Most likely, it was some campaign manager guy under him that made the mistake, but he took the responsibility. Also, Cruz got his mistaken info on Carson from CNN, who never once apologized for their mistake. I’m just wondering what it is you’re seeing in Cruz that makes you say he has “lied repeatedly”, and I definitely wonder what it is that makes you think Trump is better. Cruz may not be perfect, but at least he’s not an adulterous pervert who makes filthy remarks about his daughters. Just a little confused at your logic here.
Name one time that Ted Cruz has lied to get votes. Some of his campaign staff ran with the incorrect news of a CNN headline (as did Rubio’s and Trump’s), but that was not the man telling a lie. In fact he was the only candidate to come out and apologize for the actions of his campaign in this matter. Later he fired his campaign director who was going to rely on a lie to hurt Rubio, choosing instead to run a campaign of integrity. Since the other campaigns have found that lies against Cruz appeal to people like you, they’ve pulled out all the stoppers against Cruz and you accept it without question. Look at your own heart, you believe lies against a good man, but dismiss clear facts against the one you have chosen to defend and put your faith in; this article has you pegged.
Reblogged this on psychanne and commented:
spot on. I follow bonhoffer myself.
I agree. Trump is not a good man and not a good presidential candidate. I think Christians need to seriously wake up and recognize Trump for who he is — a lying, narcissistic, perverted con man who knows nothing about the office of President, let alone Christianity.